Wed June 26 2019


The Leader in Black Liberation


Some media outlets still refuse to call out Trump’s lies for entirely bogus reasons


Posted on 09 Jun 2019 

President Donald Trump is an unrepentant and unrelenting liar. It’s hard to think of a more basic and fundamental fact about American politics, and yet somehow, many news outlets often refuse to state outright when Trump is deceiving the public.


There are some signs things are changing, as media reporter Paul Fahri pointed out earlier this week. He noted that some outlets seem to be getting more comfortable calling out Trump’s lies as lies, despite initial hesitance. To prove this point, he cited recent headlines from CNN, Los Angeles Times, and the Financial Times. (He pointed to an example in the Chicago Tribune, as well, but it was an opinion piece, where standards are laxer.) The New York Times and the Associated Press, too, Fahri pointed out, have previously called Trump’s promotion of birtherism a lie.

Yet the unjustified resistance to labeling many of Trump’s lies as such persists.


Now, I should acknowledge that there is one good reason to avoid calling some of Trump’s false claims “lies.” Without putting to fine a point on it, Trump has clearly and repeatedly demonstrated that he is not particularly well-informed about politics or policy. He gets a lot of his information from fact-intolerant outlets like Fox News. Because of these considerations, and the general facts about human fallibility, it’s always worth considering whether Trump is just wrong or mistaken — rather than intentionally lying — when he says something false. Even if the truth seems obvious, Trump might just not realize what he is saying is wrong and would have said something different if he knew the facts. It may then be incorrect to call his claim a lie.


But above and beyond these considerations, the reluctance to label Trump’s lies is perplexing. Fahri documents several of the other explanations given for declining to label a false claim as a lie:

  • New York Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet has said they limit the use of the word lie because it “could feed the mistaken notion that we’re taking political sides.”
  • The Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler said: “You can’t get into someone’s head.”
  • Angie Drobnic Holan, the editor of PolitiFact, which largely avoids the word “lie,” said: “It’s much more important to point out why Trump is wrong and what the actual evidence shows.”

Additionally, Judy Woodruff of PBS NewsHour has made a related claim about the policy of avoiding the word “lie” on her program: “We can’t know what’s in someone mind, so we’re much more comfortable with when somebody says something that cannot be born out by the facts, we say what they said was ‘inaccurate’ or ‘false.'”

Count of comments: 0
Powered by CuteNews


In the near future a power outage happens across the United States that darkens three quarters of US cities and the majority of rural America. Authorities scramble to find the reason for the black out while rumors and theories are spread from coast the coast.

Contemporary thought would suggest that Black America simply cannot adapt to the rapid industrial logistics of 21st century advancement because of genetic slow-wittedness or simple lethargy, and that 13th generation Black descendants of Africans are a intellectually dulled liability to humanity, ripe for extinction. Keyword in the above statement is why.

Making money at any expense has become the common norm, and cuts across every socioeconomic class, race, and age group. It is an addiction for some and a life-long necessity for others. Earning money by corporate or self-employment is by nature a contribution to the advancement of society so people are taught from their youth the necessity of working and earning a living. But the work/life balance over the past 50 years has been tilted toward the work end, ultimately neglecting the life end of the scale.